Yes, absolutely. Which handle would you like?

Yes, absolutely. Which handle would you like?

Yes, absolutely. Which handle would you like?

Yes, absolutely. Which handle would you like?

Yes, absolutely. Which handle would you like?

Yes, absolutely. Which handle would you like?

Yes, if censorship resistance is an anti-feature for a community organizer, they won't use nostr. That's ok, centralized use cases can use centralized solutions (although integrating nostr would still have benefits, if only for portable identity). This is a question I've been mulling over for a long time now. Nostr is really only useful for open and semi-permeable groups.

Yes, if censorship resistance is an anti-feature for a community organizer, they won't use nostr. That's ok, centralized use cases can use centralized solutions (although integrating nostr would still have benefits, if only for portable identity). This is a question I've been mulling over for a long time now. Nostr is really only useful for open and semi-permeable groups.

Yes, if censorship resistance is an anti-feature for a community organizer, they won't use nostr. That's ok, centralized use cases can use centralized solutions (although integrating nostr would still have benefits, if only for portable identity). This is a question I've been mulling over for a long time now. Nostr is really only useful for open and semi-permeable groups.

Yes, if censorship resistance is an anti-feature for a community organizer, they won't use nostr. That's ok, centralized use cases can use centralized solutions (although integrating nostr would still have benefits, if only for portable identity). This is a question I've been mulling over for a long time now. Nostr is really only useful for open and semi-permeable groups.

Yes, if censorship resistance is an anti-feature for a community organizer, they won't use nostr. That's ok, centralized use cases can use centralized solutions (although integrating nostr would still have benefits, if only for portable identity). This is a question I've been mulling over for a long time now. Nostr is really only useful for open and semi-permeable groups.

Yes, if censorship resistance is an anti-feature for a community organizer, they won't use nostr. That's ok, centralized use cases can use centralized solutions (although integrating nostr would still have benefits, if only for portable identity). This is a question I've been mulling over for a long time now. Nostr is really only useful for open and semi-permeable groups.

Yes, if censorship resistance is an anti-feature for a community organizer, they won't use nostr. That's ok, centralized use cases can use centralized solutions (although integrating nostr would still have benefits, if only for portable identity). This is a question I've been mulling over for a long time now. Nostr is really only useful for open and semi-permeable groups.

Yes, if censorship resistance is an anti-feature for a community organizer, they won't use nostr. That's ok, centralized use cases can use centralized solutions (although integrating nostr would still have benefits, if only for portable identity). This is a question I've been mulling over for a long time now. Nostr is really only useful for open and semi-permeable groups.

Yes, if censorship resistance is an anti-feature for a community organizer, they won't use nostr. That's ok, centralized use cases can use centralized solutions (although integrating nostr would still have benefits, if only for portable identity). This is a question I've been mulling over for a long time now. Nostr is really only useful for open and semi-permeable groups.

Yes, if censorship resistance is an anti-feature for a community organizer, they won't use nostr. That's ok, centralized use cases can use centralized solutions (although integrating nostr would still have benefits, if only for portable identity). This is a question I've been mulling over for a long time now. Nostr is really only useful for open and semi-permeable groups.

Yes, if censorship resistance is an anti-feature for a community organizer, they won't use nostr. That's ok, centralized use cases can use centralized solutions (although integrating nostr would still have benefits, if only for portable identity). This is a question I've been mulling over for a long time now. Nostr is really only useful for open and semi-permeable groups.

Yes, if censorship resistance is an anti-feature for a community organizer, they won't use nostr. That's ok, centralized use cases can use centralized solutions (although integrating nostr would still have benefits, if only for portable identity). This is a question I've been mulling over for a long time now. Nostr is really only useful for open and semi-permeable groups.