This looks like the UK gulag nostr:npub1jutptdc2m8kgjmudtws095qk2tcale0eemvp4j2xnjnl4nh6669slrf04x

This looks like the UK gulag nostr:npub1jutptdc2m8kgjmudtws095qk2tcale0eemvp4j2xnjnl4nh6669slrf04x

I don't care what wallet you use as long as it's a part of a multisig setup where other keys are stored on a different vendor's hw 😉

I don't care what wallet you use as long as it's a part of a multisig setup where other keys are stored on a different vendor's hw 😉

Based son! Didn't think you Americans cared about soccer though 😂

{"created_at":1731616986,"kind":1,"sig":"510c01342c518baeba48f55c03e784a91f1f361c7c2e3f0787372603adf66e5dd33a73dcf4646f100d268d7bc46536cb7a138a528e96f292ac45100552fd07bb","pubkey":"e1fc88f8e378784587c2337f4eb90a46c0c0622c42e77d75ec4a37521f30f622","id":"82bf54ed069f63add1cb3658375a3ea575cecc30ddd3130a85b487abafc7df1e","content":"If only there was no such thing as “digital assets”. What’s the second best digital asset?","tags":[["e","fc5fb4efb1f1d74c90739cd7b5b65c00e19a857894001064ed160c6c57ff1fb9","","root"],["p","6389be6491e7b693e9f368ece88fcd145f07c068d2c1bbae4247b9b5ef439d32"]]}

{"created_at":1731616986,"kind":1,"sig":"510c01342c518baeba48f55c03e784a91f1f361c7c2e3f0787372603adf66e5dd33a73dcf4646f100d268d7bc46536cb7a138a528e96f292ac45100552fd07bb","pubkey":"e1fc88f8e378784587c2337f4eb90a46c0c0622c42e77d75ec4a37521f30f622","id":"82bf54ed069f63add1cb3658375a3ea575cecc30ddd3130a85b487abafc7df1e","content":"If only there was no such thing as “digital assets”. What’s the second best digital asset?","tags":[["e","fc5fb4efb1f1d74c90739cd7b5b65c00e19a857894001064ed160c6c57ff1fb9","","root"],["p","6389be6491e7b693e9f368ece88fcd145f07c068d2c1bbae4247b9b5ef439d32"]]}

My wording was a bit harsh too and I understand. But overall, this is a pretty disappointing move from Coinkite. The full, unaltered text of the takedown notice is here: nostr:nevent1qqspdafxqmzasft60ft6zfxs3nsm6vf3ka0pae43dg66sq2evjay8ygpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumrpdejqzxrhwden5te0wfjkccte9ehx7umhdpjhyefwvdhk6qg4waehxw309a5xjum59ehx7um5wghxcctwvsk8nct3

Hashes of JPEGs stored in an SQL database

Hashes of JPEGs stored in an SQL database

🤝

Stay ungovernable https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1856985935885328385/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/jsdHwsYmBeCL4e-x.mp4 Via humansnocontext twitter

Stay ungovernable https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1856985935885328385/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/jsdHwsYmBeCL4e-x.mp4 Via humansnocontext twitter

🤙

A positive approach would be definitively better. Keep in mind that the title rotate with different sentences, but all are still positive. And yes, the text can be shortened.

A positive approach would be definitively better. Keep in mind that the title rotate with different sentences, but all are still positive. And yes, the text can be shortened.

Hello, I too am sorting out the same quandary. Welcome 🤝

They're still big mad over the election.

Yes, the code is fully independent from anything Coinkite has made.

It's the best AI code assistant I've seen so far, but it still just doesn't feel smart enough. I tried building a feature with it this morning but ejected after an hour or so. I love the way it incrementally makes changes and gives you full control, but the code it writes misses all kinds of semantics in the code (like distinguishing milliseconds vs seconds). Still hopeful I can figure out how to use it, maybe for obvious, large refactors.

It's the best AI code assistant I've seen so far, but it still just doesn't feel smart enough. I tried building a feature with it this morning but ejected after an hour or so. I love the way it incrementally makes changes and gives you full control, but the code it writes misses all kinds of semantics in the code (like distinguishing milliseconds vs seconds). Still hopeful I can figure out how to use it, maybe for obvious, large refactors.

People don’t understand what inflation is.

People don’t understand what inflation is.

Coinkite Inc. is the developer of the "BLOCKCLOCK," a product featuring seven electronic ink digits that provide customizable cryptocurrency and blockchain information, including cryptocurrency price, volumes, exchange rates, current coin supply, block height, and Merkle root. Coinkite Inc owns the trademark "BLOCKCLOCK" (Registration No. 7237159) in Class 9 in the United States. The infringer BTCLOCK identifies its product as "BTCLOCK". It is defined as “a block with electronic ink displays, which can show stuff related to Bitcoin”. The use of "BTCLOCK" has strong similarities, both in name and functionality, with Coinkite’s registered trademark "BLOCKCLOCK", as follows: 1) Phonetic similarity: "BTCLOCK" and "BLOCKCLOCK" sound very similar. Both emphasize the term "CLOCK," with "BT" and "Block" being the only differences. The phonetic similarity can cause confusion, leading consumers to mistakenly believe the two products are related or come from the same business origin.   2) Visual similarity: The appearance of "BTCLOCK" and "BLOCKCLOCK" is also quite similar. "BT" and "Block" both consist of short prefixes followed by "Clock", which could easily cause confusion at first glance. In addition, the use of seven screens with electronic ink to display Bitcoin information gives the same impression in the users. The word BTCLOCK is displayed in the same exact position that it is in the BLOCKCLOCK.   3) Same functionality: Both products are aimed at a similar audience - people interested in cryptocurrency, specifically Bitcoin. Since both products appear to perform a similar function (displaying cryptocurrency prices), there is a high likelihood of confusion. Consumers might believe the two products are from the Coinkite, which is not accurate.   4) Risk of confusion: Since both devices seem to have similar functionality (displaying Bitcoin prices), this increases the chances that consumers could be confused about their origin. They may think "BTCLOCK" is a version or a rebranding of Coinkite's "BLOCKCLOCK." If "BTCLOCK" becomes associated with a different company or quality, it could dilute the distinctiveness of Coinkite's "BLOCKCLOCK". The use of "BTCLOCK" in GitHub could be infringing Coinkite’s trademark rights.   What would be the best solution for the alleged infringement? Are there specific changes the user can make other than removal? (e.g., transfer of trademarked username to an existing company account, removal of trademarked logo or references to company)   (1) Cease and desist the use of the words BTCLOCK, BLOCKCLOCK or similar words in the following websites: https://github.com/btclock; https://btclock.github.io/web-flasher/ (2) Remove any pictures, documents, links with the words BTCLOCK, BLOCKCLOCK or similar words from the following websites: https://github.com/btclock; https://btclock.github.io/web-flasher/ (3) Suspend and/or terminate the infringer's account BTClock.

Coinkite Inc. is the developer of the "BLOCKCLOCK," a product featuring seven electronic ink digits that provide customizable cryptocurrency and blockchain information, including cryptocurrency price, volumes, exchange rates, current coin supply, block height, and Merkle root. Coinkite Inc owns the trademark "BLOCKCLOCK" (Registration No. 7237159) in Class 9 in the United States. The infringer BTCLOCK identifies its product as "BTCLOCK". It is defined as “a block with electronic ink displays, which can show stuff related to Bitcoin”. The use of "BTCLOCK" has strong similarities, both in name and functionality, with Coinkite’s registered trademark "BLOCKCLOCK", as follows: 1) Phonetic similarity: "BTCLOCK" and "BLOCKCLOCK" sound very similar. Both emphasize the term "CLOCK," with "BT" and "Block" being the only differences. The phonetic similarity can cause confusion, leading consumers to mistakenly believe the two products are related or come from the same business origin.   2) Visual similarity: The appearance of "BTCLOCK" and "BLOCKCLOCK" is also quite similar. "BT" and "Block" both consist of short prefixes followed by "Clock", which could easily cause confusion at first glance. In addition, the use of seven screens with electronic ink to display Bitcoin information gives the same impression in the users. The word BTCLOCK is displayed in the same exact position that it is in the BLOCKCLOCK.   3) Same functionality: Both products are aimed at a similar audience - people interested in cryptocurrency, specifically Bitcoin. Since both products appear to perform a similar function (displaying cryptocurrency prices), there is a high likelihood of confusion. Consumers might believe the two products are from the Coinkite, which is not accurate.   4) Risk of confusion: Since both devices seem to have similar functionality (displaying Bitcoin prices), this increases the chances that consumers could be confused about their origin. They may think "BTCLOCK" is a version or a rebranding of Coinkite's "BLOCKCLOCK." If "BTCLOCK" becomes associated with a different company or quality, it could dilute the distinctiveness of Coinkite's "BLOCKCLOCK". The use of "BTCLOCK" in GitHub could be infringing Coinkite’s trademark rights.   What would be the best solution for the alleged infringement? Are there specific changes the user can make other than removal? (e.g., transfer of trademarked username to an existing company account, removal of trademarked logo or references to company)   (1) Cease and desist the use of the words BTCLOCK, BLOCKCLOCK or similar words in the following websites: https://github.com/btclock; https://btclock.github.io/web-flasher/ (2) Remove any pictures, documents, links with the words BTCLOCK, BLOCKCLOCK or similar words from the following websites: https://github.com/btclock; https://btclock.github.io/web-flasher/ (3) Suspend and/or terminate the infringer's account BTClock.