Can you recommend any good non-scam no-kyc Lightning <> Monero exchanges?

isn't the guy on the right that guy who tried to shoot trump? router or something, roelof or whatever, fuckin crinkly woke cult-fluencer

I can’t trust Nostr devs to make good cryptography. I would encrypt messages with PGP and sending them over I2P. nostr:note1ekgsp38m0lc2wvp5n5cycyvtd6nl8j79cac0wccet2g5kyjkqurqhdnv7e

+

Satoshi knew Bitcoin is a Veblen good. Now the gay bears say they’d be happy with a $150k top because they don’t understand Bitcoin’s TAM. They think houses and equities are priced appropriately. They don’t know what “monetary premium” means. Never even heard the names Mises or Rothbard. People who even self custody. nostr:note1pup35v49vquags96t9pypec57vxaw7tjhmme4gflfldzsxkjqu5q4mmmw0

This is precisely the use of Monero that I have analyzed, but it is neither economical nor practical, so I am not convinced by it or any of the other methods I have mentioned.

I used to think monero was better than bitcoin for privacy, but now I know monero is not necessary. We can achieve privacy using chaumian e-cash instead of a blockchain. What's more, these e-cash solutions are interoperable with the lightning network. The steel-man argument against this is that chaumian mints require some trust. This is true, but Bitcoin is a peer to peer electronic cash system that requires no trust. We can trutnthst there will never be more than 21 million #bitcoin. Every other blockchain is an attempted breach of that trust, an attempt at debasing bitcoin the same way governments have debased gold by adding other metal to it. That's my two sats. I would rather trust a few thousand sats with an e cash provider than try to debase the p2p electronic cash system that bitcoin is. In the Wealth of Nations Adam Smith talks about the debasement of currencies by governments all around the world. They achieved this by smelting different metals with gold, making each coin contain less and less gold over time. I see all alt coins as an attempt to debase bitcoin, a peer to peer electronic cash system. My node does not accept these debasment coins. I do view stablecoins a little differently however. For example, USDT is a digital representation of the dollar backed by the very financial instrument that is used to debase those dollars. I believe stablecoins are monetizing the debt, which debases fiat. This is not an argument for stablecoins, they're ust a little different.

I used to think monero was better than bitcoin for privacy, but now I know monero is not necessary. We can achieve privacy using chaumian e-cash instead of a blockchain. What's more, these e-cash solutions are interoperable with the lightning network. The steel-man argument against this is that chaumian mints require some trust. This is true, but Bitcoin is a peer to peer electronic cash system that requires no trust. We can trutnthst there will never be more than 21 million #bitcoin. Every other blockchain is an attempted breach of that trust, an attempt at debasing bitcoin the same way governments have debased gold by adding other metal to it. That's my two sats. I would rather trust a few thousand sats with an e cash provider than try to debase the p2p electronic cash system that bitcoin is. In the Wealth of Nations Adam Smith talks about the debasement of currencies by governments all around the world. They achieved this by smelting different metals with gold, making each coin contain less and less gold over time. I see all alt coins as an attempt to debase bitcoin, a peer to peer electronic cash system. My node does not accept these debasment coins. I do view stablecoins a little differently however. For example, USDT is a digital representation of the dollar backed by the very financial instrument that is used to debase those dollars. I believe stablecoins are monetizing the debt, which debases fiat. This is not an argument for stablecoins, they're ust a little different.

I used to think monero was better than bitcoin for privacy, but now I know monero is not necessary. We can achieve privacy using chaumian e-cash instead of a blockchain. What's more, these e-cash solutions are interoperable with the lightning network. The steel-man argument against this is that chaumian mints require some trust. This is true, but Bitcoin is a peer to peer electronic cash system that requires no trust. We can trutnthst there will never be more than 21 million #bitcoin. Every other blockchain is an attempted breach of that trust, an attempt at debasing bitcoin the same way governments have debased gold by adding other metal to it. That's my two sats. I would rather trust a few thousand sats with an e cash provider than try to debase the p2p electronic cash system that bitcoin is. In the Wealth of Nations Adam Smith talks about the debasement of currencies by governments all around the world. They achieved this by smelting different metals with gold, making each coin contain less and less gold over time. I see all alt coins as an attempt to debase bitcoin, a peer to peer electronic cash system. My node does not accept these debasment coins. I do view stablecoins a little differently however. For example, USDT is a digital representation of the dollar backed by the very financial instrument that is used to debase those dollars. I believe stablecoins are monetizing the debt, which debases fiat. This is not an argument for stablecoins, they're ust a little different.

I used to think monero was better than bitcoin for privacy, but now I know monero is not necessary. We can achieve privacy using chaumian e-cash instead of a blockchain. What's more, these e-cash solutions are interoperable with the lightning network. The steel-man argument against this is that chaumian mints require some trust. This is true, but Bitcoin is a peer to peer electronic cash system that requires no trust. We can trutnthst there will never be more than 21 million #bitcoin. Every other blockchain is an attempted breach of that trust, an attempt at debasing bitcoin the same way governments have debased gold by adding other metal to it. That's my two sats. I would rather trust a few thousand sats with an e cash provider than try to debase the p2p electronic cash system that bitcoin is. In the Wealth of Nations Adam Smith talks about the debasement of currencies by governments all around the world. They achieved this by smelting different metals with gold, making each coin contain less and less gold over time. I see all alt coins as an attempt to debase bitcoin, a peer to peer electronic cash system. My node does not accept these debasment coins. I do view stablecoins a little differently however. For example, USDT is a digital representation of the dollar backed by the very financial instrument that is used to debase those dollars. I believe stablecoins are monetizing the debt, which debases fiat. This is not an argument for stablecoins, they're ust a little different.

I used to think monero was better than bitcoin for privacy, but now I know monero is not necessary. We can achieve privacy using chaumian e-cash instead of a blockchain. What's more, these e-cash solutions are interoperable with the lightning network. The steel-man argument against this is that chaumian mints require some trust. This is true, but Bitcoin is a peer to peer electronic cash system that requires no trust. We can trutnthst there will never be more than 21 million #bitcoin. Every other blockchain is an attempted breach of that trust, an attempt at debasing bitcoin the same way governments have debased gold by adding other metal to it. That's my two sats. I would rather trust a few thousand sats with an e cash provider than try to debase the p2p electronic cash system that bitcoin is. In the Wealth of Nations Adam Smith talks about the debasement of currencies by governments all around the world. They achieved this by smelting different metals with gold, making each coin contain less and less gold over time. I see all alt coins as an attempt to debase bitcoin, a peer to peer electronic cash system. My node does not accept these debasment coins. I do view stablecoins a little differently however. For example, USDT is a digital representation of the dollar backed by the very financial instrument that is used to debase those dollars. I believe stablecoins are monetizing the debt, which debases fiat. This is not an argument for stablecoins, they're ust a little different.

I used to think monero was better than bitcoin for privacy, but now I know monero is not necessary. We can achieve privacy using chaumian e-cash instead of a blockchain. What's more, these e-cash solutions are interoperable with the lightning network. The steel-man argument against this is that chaumian mints require some trust. This is true, but Bitcoin is a peer to peer electronic cash system that requires no trust. We can trutnthst there will never be more than 21 million #bitcoin. Every other blockchain is an attempted breach of that trust, an attempt at debasing bitcoin the same way governments have debased gold by adding other metal to it. That's my two sats. I would rather trust a few thousand sats with an e cash provider than try to debase the p2p electronic cash system that bitcoin is. In the Wealth of Nations Adam Smith talks about the debasement of currencies by governments all around the world. They achieved this by smelting different metals with gold, making each coin contain less and less gold over time. I see all alt coins as an attempt to debase bitcoin, a peer to peer electronic cash system. My node does not accept these debasment coins. I do view stablecoins a little differently however. For example, USDT is a digital representation of the dollar backed by the very financial instrument that is used to debase those dollars. I believe stablecoins are monetizing the debt, which debases fiat. This is not an argument for stablecoins, they're ust a little different.

I used to think monero was better than bitcoin for privacy, but now I know monero is not necessary. We can achieve privacy using chaumian e-cash instead of a blockchain. What's more, these e-cash solutions are interoperable with the lightning network. The steel-man argument against this is that chaumian mints require some trust. This is true, but Bitcoin is a peer to peer electronic cash system that requires no trust. We can trutnthst there will never be more than 21 million #bitcoin. Every other blockchain is an attempted breach of that trust, an attempt at debasing bitcoin the same way governments have debased gold by adding other metal to it. That's my two sats. I would rather trust a few thousand sats with an e cash provider than try to debase the p2p electronic cash system that bitcoin is. In the Wealth of Nations Adam Smith talks about the debasement of currencies by governments all around the world. They achieved this by smelting different metals with gold, making each coin contain less and less gold over time. I see all alt coins as an attempt to debase bitcoin, a peer to peer electronic cash system. My node does not accept these debasment coins. I do view stablecoins a little differently however. For example, USDT is a digital representation of the dollar backed by the very financial instrument that is used to debase those dollars. I believe stablecoins are monetizing the debt, which debases fiat. This is not an argument for stablecoins, they're ust a little different.

I used to think monero was better than bitcoin for privacy, but now I know monero is not necessary. We can achieve privacy using chaumian e-cash instead of a blockchain. What's more, these e-cash solutions are interoperable with the lightning network. The steel-man argument against this is that chaumian mints require some trust. This is true, but Bitcoin is a peer to peer electronic cash system that requires no trust. We can trutnthst there will never be more than 21 million #bitcoin. Every other blockchain is an attempted breach of that trust, an attempt at debasing bitcoin the same way governments have debased gold by adding other metal to it. That's my two sats. I would rather trust a few thousand sats with an e cash provider than try to debase the p2p electronic cash system that bitcoin is. In the Wealth of Nations Adam Smith talks about the debasement of currencies by governments all around the world. They achieved this by smelting different metals with gold, making each coin contain less and less gold over time. I see all alt coins as an attempt to debase bitcoin, a peer to peer electronic cash system. My node does not accept these debasment coins. I do view stablecoins a little differently however. For example, USDT is a digital representation of the dollar backed by the very financial instrument that is used to debase those dollars. I believe stablecoins are monetizing the debt, which debases fiat. This is not an argument for stablecoins, they're ust a little different.

I used to think monero was better than bitcoin for privacy, but now I know monero is not necessary. We can achieve privacy using chaumian e-cash instead of a blockchain. What's more, these e-cash solutions are interoperable with the lightning network. The steel-man argument against this is that chaumian mints require some trust. This is true, but Bitcoin is a peer to peer electronic cash system that requires no trust. We can trutnthst there will never be more than 21 million #bitcoin. Every other blockchain is an attempted breach of that trust, an attempt at debasing bitcoin the same way governments have debased gold by adding other metal to it. That's my two sats. I would rather trust a few thousand sats with an e cash provider than try to debase the p2p electronic cash system that bitcoin is. In the Wealth of Nations Adam Smith talks about the debasement of currencies by governments all around the world. They achieved this by smelting different metals with gold, making each coin contain less and less gold over time. I see all alt coins as an attempt to debase bitcoin, a peer to peer electronic cash system. My node does not accept these debasment coins. I do view stablecoins a little differently however. For example, USDT is a digital representation of the dollar backed by the very financial instrument that is used to debase those dollars. I believe stablecoins are monetizing the debt, which debases fiat. This is not an argument for stablecoins, they're ust a little different.

I used to think monero was better than bitcoin for privacy, but now I know monero is not necessary. We can achieve privacy using chaumian e-cash instead of a blockchain. What's more, these e-cash solutions are interoperable with the lightning network. The steel-man argument against this is that chaumian mints require some trust. This is true, but Bitcoin is a peer to peer electronic cash system that requires no trust. We can trutnthst there will never be more than 21 million #bitcoin. Every other blockchain is an attempted breach of that trust, an attempt at debasing bitcoin the same way governments have debased gold by adding other metal to it. That's my two sats. I would rather trust a few thousand sats with an e cash provider than try to debase the p2p electronic cash system that bitcoin is. In the Wealth of Nations Adam Smith talks about the debasement of currencies by governments all around the world. They achieved this by smelting different metals with gold, making each coin contain less and less gold over time. I see all alt coins as an attempt to debase bitcoin, a peer to peer electronic cash system. My node does not accept these debasment coins. I do view stablecoins a little differently however. For example, USDT is a digital representation of the dollar backed by the very financial instrument that is used to debase those dollars. I believe stablecoins are monetizing the debt, which debases fiat. This is not an argument for stablecoins, they're ust a little different.

Unsurprisingly, sex sells, especially when it comes with a splash of pseudo-personal connection. Prostitutes figured this out a looooong time ago. A few people may make some money using paywalls, but paywalls still don’t work in the big picture when it comes to digital content unless someone is popular and well known. This is even true with that OnlyFans report, as they found that among millions of users the AVERAGE only made $1300 per year. That means most made far less than than while only a few made anything significant amount. Not really as good an argument as you think it is.

On its own I never recommend Monero because you will lose purchasing power. I only recommend Monero as a privacy tool. For example receive in Monero and immediately make an atomic swap, or when you are going to spend make a swap from bitcoin to Monero and spend. But it is not economical.

Monero loses purchasing power relative to bitcoin, do what you want, it's not my problem, don't come here to convince me of your bullshit 😂.

In this sense, it's more typical of a precious metal. Instead of the supply changing to keep the value the same, the supply is predetermined and the value changes. As the number of users grows, the value per coin increases. It has the potential for a positive feedback loop; as users increase, the value goes up, which could attract more users to take advantage of the increasing value.

Gm, especially to the ladies 😏

I have always suspected this kind of fuckery was going on. nostr:note1acvlfqarhvkl36cke2e6gypcj2suhl2w8uccn2lam6d5f5g6walsakhact

Honestly a decent chance that happens 😂

Bitcoin makes all its upward movements in just 9 days a year, it is statistically proven, even less days, if one of those days you are in Monero you have screwed it.