For futurism and preterism, it's a false dichotomy of viewpoints regarding the book of Revelation. Futurism: The belief (which is the most popular) where all of the events tying the 70th Week of Daniel, the Olivet Discourse, Revelation and other prophecies are tied to the end times, and that a one-man antichrist reigns from Jerusalem (where some blackpilled Catholics say the Antichrist will reign in the NWO). Preterism: The belief that all of the above had happened, and that the Antichrist was Nero. There was, in fact, Hebrew numerology done on Nero, which was equal to the trihexa. However, that was proven to be false, as if everything happened... Both of the above were created by Jesuit beasts (false priests) whose job it was to lead the people astray from rightfully calling out the Roman Catholic Church as the harlot, and the office of the Papacy as the Antichrist, and the office of the Jesuit Superior General as the False Prophet. Historicism: The belief that MOST of Revelation was fulfilled (and so was all of the 70th Week of Daniel, and the Olivet Discourse). The article I sent is proof of this. It basically says that we already have the Antichrist (the Pope) and the False Prophet (the Jesuit Superior General), which are offices of these positions. Revelation started being fulfilled in November of 66 AD with the Great Tribulation (the Jewish-Roman War) until Jerusalem was destroyed for the Judeans (they're not Jews) being unfaithful, and Rome being used to destroy Jerusalem. This was the start of 1,900 years of judgment against Rome, where all the stage leads to.